Hyperliquid fees documentation says fees are based on rolling 14 day volume, assessed at the end of each UTC day, with separate schedules for perps and spot; sub-account volume counts toward the master account fee tier while vault volume is treated separately.출처 보기 ↗ A Hyperliquid fees search should split cost evidence into four official lanes: the fee schedule for maker/taker tiers, funding docs for hourly peer-to-peer funding, contract specifications for market mechanics, and liquidation docs for maintenance-margin failure paths.출처 보기 ↗ Hyperliquid funding docs say funding is peer-to-peer, collected by neither side of the venue, paid every hour, and based on the difference between the perpetual contract price and the spot oracle price.출처 보기 ↗ A Hyperliquid fees query should be read as a bundle: maker/taker schedule, hourly funding, margin mode and liquidation threshold can all change the position cost before PnL is known.출처 보기 ↗ Before placing a Hyperliquid perp order, compare the quoted maker/taker tier, expected hourly funding direction, margin mode, maintenance margin, liquidation path, bridge or USDC movement cost, and whether the order belongs to main account, sub-account or API wallet flow.출처 보기 ↗ Hyperliquid combines perp and spot volume into one fee tier, with spot volume counting double in the published 14-day weighted-volume formula; the applicable maker or taker rate still depends on the current official tier and asset context.출처 보기 ↗ HIP-3 perpetuals share the user's fee tier, but growth mode and deployer-configured fee shares can change all-in fees, rebates and volume contribution. Users should verify the specific HIP-3 market instead of applying one protocol-wide perp rate.출처 보기 ↗ |