Pesquisa verificada por fontes: Bybit

Verified source facts

1. Bybit scheduled restoration of RPI eligibility for 10:00 UTC on September 22, 2026. 2. The change covers ten named TradFi perpetual symbols, including TSLAUSDT, AAPLUSDT and SPYUSDT. 3. RPI orders are maker-only and can match only against eligible retail taker flow. 4. Bybit says standard order-book matching, fees and order types for the affected symbols remain unchanged.

Comparison at a glance

1. Compare status on the same job

A platform comparison becomes useful only when both venues are measured against one job. For status, that job concerns announced, filed or live. Marketing pages frequently describe broad capability while the actual decision lives in a specific pair, contract, network, entity, or account tier. Build two evidence rows from the same timestamp, then verify milestone. Until that check is complete, neither venue earns the point.

The comparison should distinguish a published ceiling from an executable outcome. A fee table does not reveal slippage; a product menu does not prove regional eligibility; a security feature page does not prove the control is enabled on the reader's account. Record the route from public statement to authenticated evidence. The unresolved variable is premature conclusion, so the scorecard must preserve that blank instead of awarding a speculative advantage.

For status, connect the finding to the reader's actual order plan rather than the other nine rows in the abstract. Document how announced, filed or live changes the entry, exit, monitoring, or fallback decision, and make the operator verify milestone. The remaining uncertainty—premature conclusion—belongs in the dated scorecard. That produces a job-specific preference instead of a permanent winner.

2. Compare time on the same job

For time, that job concerns official UTC timestamp. Build two evidence rows from the same timestamp, then convert locally.

The unresolved variable is missed cutoff, so the scorecard must preserve that blank instead of awarding a speculative advantage.

For time, connect the finding to the reader's actual order plan rather than the other nine rows in the abstract. Document how official UTC timestamp changes the entry, exit, monitoring, or fallback decision, and make the operator convert locally. The remaining uncertainty—missed cutoff—belongs in the dated scorecard.

3. Compare eligibility on the same job

For eligibility, that job concerns jurisdiction and account type. Build two evidence rows from the same timestamp, then check access.

The unresolved variable is blocked action, so the scorecard must preserve that blank instead of awarding a speculative advantage.

For eligibility, connect the finding to the reader's actual order plan rather than the other nine rows in the abstract. Document how jurisdiction and account type changes the entry, exit, monitoring, or fallback decision, and make the operator check access. The remaining uncertainty—blocked action—belongs in the dated scorecard.

4. Compare instrument on the same job

For instrument, that job concerns spot, future or tokenized claim. Build two evidence rows from the same timestamp, then identify legal form.

The unresolved variable is category error, so the scorecard must preserve that blank instead of awarding a speculative advantage.

For instrument, connect the finding to the reader's actual order plan rather than the other nine rows in the abstract. Document how spot, future or tokenized claim changes the entry, exit, monitoring, or fallback decision, and make the operator identify legal form. The remaining uncertainty—category error—belongs in the dated scorecard.

5. Compare execution on the same job

For execution, that job concerns book, pool or matching mode. Build two evidence rows from the same timestamp, then inspect mechanism.

The unresolved variable is fill surprise, so the scorecard must preserve that blank instead of awarding a speculative advantage.

For execution, connect the finding to the reader's actual order plan rather than the other nine rows in the abstract. Document how book, pool or matching mode changes the entry, exit, monitoring, or fallback decision, and make the operator inspect mechanism. The remaining uncertainty—fill surprise—belongs in the dated scorecard.

6. Compare fees on the same job

For fees, that job concerns published schedule. Build two evidence rows from the same timestamp, then calculate total cost.

The unresolved variable is cost overrun, so the scorecard must preserve that blank instead of awarding a speculative advantage.

For fees, connect the finding to the reader's actual order plan rather than the other nine rows in the abstract. Document how published schedule changes the entry, exit, monitoring, or fallback decision, and make the operator calculate total cost. The remaining uncertainty—cost overrun—belongs in the dated scorecard.

7. Compare liquidity on the same job

For liquidity, that job concerns venue and symbol specific. Build two evidence rows from the same timestamp, then check depth.

The unresolved variable is slippage, so the scorecard must preserve that blank instead of awarding a speculative advantage.

For liquidity, connect the finding to the reader's actual order plan rather than the other nine rows in the abstract. Document how venue and symbol specific changes the entry, exit, monitoring, or fallback decision, and make the operator check depth. The remaining uncertainty—slippage—belongs in the dated scorecard.

8. Compare operations on the same job

For operations, that job concerns deposit, withdrawal or settlement. Build two evidence rows from the same timestamp, then verify live status.

The unresolved variable is stuck funds, so the scorecard must preserve that blank instead of awarding a speculative advantage.

For operations, connect the finding to the reader's actual order plan rather than the other nine rows in the abstract. Document how deposit, withdrawal or settlement changes the entry, exit, monitoring, or fallback decision, and make the operator verify live status. The remaining uncertainty—stuck funds—belongs in the dated scorecard.

9. Compare evidence on the same job

For evidence, that job concerns primary notice and file number. Build two evidence rows from the same timestamp, then retain source.

The unresolved variable is audit gap, so the scorecard must preserve that blank instead of awarding a speculative advantage.

For evidence, connect the finding to the reader's actual order plan rather than the other nine rows in the abstract. Document how primary notice and file number changes the entry, exit, monitoring, or fallback decision, and make the operator retain source. The remaining uncertainty—audit gap—belongs in the dated scorecard.

10. Compare stop rule on the same job

For stop rule, that job concerns material fact remains unverified. Build two evidence rows from the same timestamp, then pause and confirm.

The unresolved variable is unsupported decision, so the scorecard must preserve that blank instead of awarding a speculative advantage.

For stop rule, connect the finding to the reader's actual order plan rather than the other nine rows in the abstract. Document how material fact remains unverified changes the entry, exit, monitoring, or fallback decision, and make the operator pause and confirm. The remaining uncertainty—unsupported decision—belongs in the dated scorecard.

Sources and editorial method

• Restoration of RPI eligibility for selected TradFi Perpetual Contracts — Bybit
• TradFi information upgrades — Bybit
• Derivatives fee update — Bybit